Unveiling the Secrets: OpenSSL Encryption and Decryption with Session Data vs. MySQL Storage Through the Lens of Sun Tzu

In the digital battlefield, securing data is paramount. OpenSSL encryption and decryption are crucial weapons in our arsenal, and understanding the strategic use of session data (cookies) versus MySQL storage can make all the difference. To explore these strategies, we’ll turn to the ancient wisdom of Sun Tzu’s “The Art of War,” examining the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches and how they align with Sun Tzu’s principles.

The Battlefield: OpenSSL Encryption and Decryption

OpenSSL is a robust toolkit that provides cryptographic functions, including encryption and decryption. Its strength lies in its ability to secure data using algorithms like AES-256, combined with mechanisms such as initialization vectors (IVs) and hash-based message authentication codes (HMACs). But where should this encryption and decryption take place? In the realms of session data or database storage?

Session Data (Cookies): The Quick Strike

1. The Strategy of Speed and Agility

• Convenience: Storing encryption keys or encrypted data in session cookies offers swift access and ease of implementation. This is akin to a swift cavalry maneuver, allowing for rapid deployment and access to encrypted data.
• Stateless Operations: Sessions offer a temporary battlefield, where data and keys are managed on a per-session basis. This approach allows for quick encryption and decryption but limits the persistence of data to the lifespan of the session.

2. The Risks of the Quick Strike

• Security Risks: Session cookies are stored on the client-side, making them vulnerable to attacks such as cross-site scripting (XSS). The strategic challenge here is to safeguard the session data as it traverses the battlefield.
• Limited Persistence: Once the session ends, so do the cookies, making this strategy less suitable for long-term data storage.

Sun Tzu’s Wisdom: “Speed is the essence of war.” The agility of session storage aligns with this principle, offering rapid access but at the cost of security and persistence.

MySQL Storage: The Strategic Fortification

1. The Strategy of Long-Term Security

• Persistent Storage: MySQL databases provide a secure, long-term storage solution for both encryption keys and encrypted data. This is like fortifying a stronghold, ensuring data remains secure even beyond the immediate campaign.
• Controlled Access: By keeping sensitive information on the server-side, you reduce exposure to client-side attacks. This strategy is more resilient to external threats.

2. The Risks of Fortification

• Performance Overhead: Accessing and managing data in MySQL can introduce latency compared to session storage. This is akin to the slower movement of a fortified army compared to a fast-moving cavalry.
• Complexity: Implementing encryption and decryption with MySQL involves additional complexity, such as handling database connections and ensuring robust security measures for stored data.

Sun Tzu’s Wisdom: “The skillful fighter puts himself into a position which makes defeat impossible.” Using MySQL for secure storage aligns with this principle, ensuring long-term security and control, albeit with a potential trade-off in agility and performance.

Comparative Analysis

1. Security and Persistence

• Session Data: Offers immediate access but with higher risks and lower persistence. Ideal for temporary or ephemeral data needs.
• MySQL Storage: Provides persistent and secure data storage but with added complexity and potential performance costs. Suitable for long-term data management.

2. Flexibility vs. Fortification

• Session Data: Flexibility and speed in data handling, akin to a quick strike on the battlefield. However, security and persistence are not as fortified.
• MySQL Storage: Fortified and secure, but potentially slower and more complex to manage. A strategic choice for long-term data protection.

Sun Tzu’s Wisdom: “Know your enemy and know yourself and you can fight a hundred battles without disaster.” Understanding the strengths and limitations of each approach allows you to choose the best strategy for your specific needs.

Examples:

1. OpenSSL Encryption/Decryption Using Stored Session Data (Cookies) Demo
2. OpenSSL Encryption/Decryption Using Random Cyphers & Stored Session Data (Cookies) Demo

Conclusion

In the realm of data encryption and decryption, the choice between session storage and MySQL storage reflects a balance between speed, security, and persistence. Like Sun Tzu’s strategic principles, your approach should be guided by the context and objectives of your mission. Whether you opt for the agility of session data or the fortification of MySQL, aligning your strategy with your needs ensures a victorious outcome in the ever-evolving landscape of digital security.

By applying these ancient strategies to modern encryption practices, you can better navigate the complexities of data security, ensuring that your digital battlefield is well-defended and strategically sound.

Part 1: BotNets – What Are They and What Is Their Purpose?

What Are Botnets?

A botnet is a network of compromised computers or devices, known as “bots” or “zombies,” which are controlled remotely by an attacker, often referred to as a “botmaster” or “bot herder.” These botnets can be used to perform a variety of malicious activities, typically without the knowledge of the device owners.

Evolution of Botnets

1. Early Days:
   • IRC-Based Botnets (1990s): The earliest botnets used Internet Relay Chat (IRC) to command infected machines. These bots were often created for fun or minor pranks but set the stage for more serious threats.
   • Example: The “Sub 7” and “Back Orifice” trojans were among the first to create such networks.
2. 2000s – Rise of Complexity:
   • Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Networks: Botnets evolved to use P2P networks to avoid centralized control and improve resilience.
   • Example: The “Storm Worm” utilized a P2P architecture to distribute commands.
3. 2010s – Advanced Botnets:
   • Botnets as a Service: The commercialization of botnets turned them into a service for hire.
   • Example: The “Mirai” botnet, which primarily targeted IoT devices, became infamous for its scale and impact.
4. 2020s – Sophisticated and Distributed Attacks:
   • Targeted Attacks and Cryptojacking: Modern botnets often focus on specific targets or exploit devices for cryptojacking.
   • Example: “Emotet” and “TrickBot” are known for their sophisticated modularity and targeted attacks.

Common Uses of Botnets

1. Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attacks:
   • Overwhelm a target server or network with traffic to make it inaccessible.
2. Spam and Phishing:
   • Distribute large volumes of spam emails or phishing attempts to harvest personal information.
3. Data Theft:
   • Steal sensitive information from compromised systems.
4. Cryptojacking:
   • Utilize infected devices to mine cryptocurrency without the user’s consent.
5. Click Fraud:
   • Automate clicks on online ads to generate fraudulent revenue.

Key Terminology

• Botmaster/Bot Herder: The individual who controls the botnet.
• Command and Control (C2): The server or infrastructure used to send commands to the bots.
• Infection Vector: The method by which the botnet malware is spread (e.g., phishing, exploit kits).
• Zombies/Bots: Infected devices within the botnet.

Popular Variants

1. Mirai:
   • Known for its large-scale attacks using IoT devices.
   • Exploits default passwords on IoT devices.
2. Emotet:
   • Initially a banking trojan, evolved into a modular botnet used for a variety of malicious activities.
   • Known for its resilience and ability to distribute other malware.
3. Zeus/Zbot:
   • A banking trojan that evolved into a powerful botnet for stealing financial credentials.
4. Conficker:
   • One of the largest and most infamous botnets, known for its ability to spread through vulnerabilities in Windows operating systems.

Part 2: A Basic Example of a Botnet

Overview

Let’s look at a simple Python script example to demonstrate the concept of a botnet. This example is for educational purposes only and should not be used for any malicious activities.

Basic Botnet Example in Python

# Example BotNet In Python:

import socket
import threading

# This is the bot (client) code.

def connect_to_server():
    server_ip = "127.0.0.1"  # IP of the command and control server (for demonstration)
    server_port = 12345      # Port of the command and control server

    s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
    try:
        s.connect((server_ip, server_port))
        print("Connected to server")
        
        while True:
            command = s.recv(1024).decode('utf-8')
            if command == "shutdown":
                print("Shutting down...")
                break
            else:
                # Execute command
                print(f"Received command: {command}")
                # For security reasons, this part is left out in this example.
                # You could use os.system(command) to execute commands.
        
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"Error: {e}")
    finally:
        s.close()

def main():
    # Create multiple threads to simulate multiple bots
    for i in range(5):  # Simulating 5 bots
        t = threading.Thread(target=connect_to_server)
        t.start()

if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

Explanation

1. Socket Setup:
   • The socket library is used to create a network connection. The bot connects to a predefined IP address and port number of the command and control (C2) server.
2. Connection Handling:
   • The connect_to_server() function establishes a connection to the C2 server and listens for commands.
3. Command Execution:
   • The bot waits for commands from the C2 server. If it receives a command (e.g., “shutdown”), it performs the action. In a real-world scenario, commands could be anything, including executing system commands or sending data.
4. Multithreading:
   • Multiple threads are created to simulate multiple bots connecting to the C2 server concurrently. Each thread represents an individual bot.
5. Error Handling:
   • Basic error handling is in place to catch and display any exceptions that occur during the connection or execution process.

Note

This example demonstrates a simplified version of a botnet client. In real-world scenarios, botnets are more complex and include additional features such as encryption, obfuscation, and advanced command structures. This script is provided for educational purposes to understand the basic principles of how botnets operate.

Related Links:
Home Network Router Attacks
BotNet Archive – For Educational Purposes Only!

Simple Visitor Logger 2.0

A simple and easy to use php Visitor Logger that saves log files in an easy to work with file and directory structure. You can customize every aspect of the logger and it adds the new Google Maps link to the Visitor Geo-Location Information. I also activated the Referring URL for this Public Version as well.

This is a Public Demo and Not Available For Download.
If you’re interested in a copy, find me.

Senya – MySQL Database Editor

Sleek and easy to use MySQL Database Editor.
Enter Server Configuration Manually Or Automatically From File.

By: K0NxT3D
Version: 2.0.1
URL: http://www.seaverns.com/senya/
File: Senya_2.0.zip
Senya 2.0 Files:
index.php – Main Page
display_table.php – Display MySQL Tables
update.php – Update MySQL Tables
style.css – Default Style
saved_hosts.txt – Example Autoload Configuration File

K0NxT3D

Senya 1.0 Cross Domain WordPress Data Mining Utility

Сеня 1.0 – K0NxT3D 2024
Back End WordPress Utility

Features:

• Edit WordPress Database.
• Edit WordPress User Tables.
• Edit WordPress User Information.
• Display WordPress Domain and Associated Admin Email Addresses Across Multiple Domains.

A simple and easy to use PHP/HTML Based MySQL Back End Connection Utility with Editing Capabilities and Email Harvesting across Multiple Domains.

Download

I collect a lot of data and data mining is just one of those things that I enjoy.
I build Web Crawlers and Web Scrapers often, but I really love tracking other
bots, some of which I’ve “known” for decades now.

With the ever expanding Facebook Empire, I’ve been catching a lot of the
hits from FacebookExternalHit,
[ facebookexternalhit/1.1 (+http://www.facebook.com/externalhit_uatext.php) ]
and while Facebook it’self is being overrun by nefarious bots and hacked accounts,
their problem is my solution.

The majority of the hits from FacebookExternalHit have preceded an attack, which tells me several things.
1: Facebook For Developers has given nefarious actors an edge on the Facebook user and I won’t go into detail on that, but I can make better informed security decisions based on what can be done from that side of the platform.

2: I can test my security software on both Facebook and my websites by simply posting a link to Facebook and this is really handy in my line of work. I get to see which Data Center the bot is coming from (GeoLocation), how many bots that particular Data Center has (Interesting Data There) and how fast the reaction time is, which helps determine the software being used and in which manner it’s being used.

3: Most Importantly, it gives me reasons to build new software.

So, I built this database for such purpose as to collect more data on the situation and there’s some interesting patterns developing. While it’s not exactly something I feel the urge to release, it’s worth sharing.

FBDC uses Php and MySQL, a pretty simple database and small file sizes (I like small files).
The User Input Form Works.. Ikr, a form that works??
It has a few things left to work out on the user input; I’m a big fan of getting my hands dirty,
so Updating the Data Center / BotInfo is being done via phpmyadmin until I build a better form.
Here’s a few screenshots:

FBDC – Facebook Data Centers and FacebookExternalHit Bot Collected Data – Main Menu

FBDC – Facebook Data Centers and FacebookExternalHit Bot Collected Data – Data Center List

FBDC – Facebook Data Centers and FacebookExternalHit Bot Collected Data – BotInfo List

FBDC – Facebook Data Centers and FacebookExternalHit Bot Collected Data – User Input Form

FBDC – Facebook Data Centers and FacebookExternalHit Bot Collected Data – Because There HAS to be a Hacker Theme too.

Russian Hackers breached Microsoft to find out what Microsoft knows about them..

Maybe Microsoft should use Linux?

Original Article: TechCrunch

Wouldn’t you want to know what tech giants know about you?
That’s exactly what Russian government hackers want, too.

On Friday, Microsoft disclosed that the hacking group it calls Midnight Blizzard, also known as APT29 or Cozy Bear — and widely believed to be sponsored by the Russian government — hacked some corporate email accounts, including those of the company’s “senior leadership team and employees in our cybersecurity, legal, and other functions.”

Russian Hackers Hack Microsoft

Curiously, the hackers didn’t go after customer data or the traditional corporate information they may have normally gone after. They wanted to know more about themselves, or more specifically, they wanted to know what Microsoft knows about them, according to the company.

“The investigation indicates they were initially targeting email accounts for information related to Midnight Blizzard itself,” the company wrote in a blog post and SEC disclosure.

According to Microsoft, the hackers used a “password spray attack” — essentially brute forcing — against a legacy account, then used that account’s permissions “to access a very small percentage of Microsoft corporate email accounts.”

Microsoft did not disclose how many email accounts were breached, nor exactly what information the hackers accessed or stole.

Company spokespeople did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Microsoft took advantage of news of this hack to talk about how they are going to move forward to make itself more secure.

“For Microsoft, this incident has highlighted the urgent need to move even faster. We will act immediately to apply our current security standards to Microsoft-owned legacy systems and internal business processes, even when these changes might cause disruption to existing business processes,” the company wrote. “This will likely cause some level of disruption while we adapt to this new reality, but this is a necessary step, and only the first of several we will be taking to embrace this philosophy.”

APT29, or Cozy Bear, is widely believed to be a Russian hacking group working responsible for a series of high-profile attacks, such as those against SolarWinds in 2019, the Democratic National Committee in 2015, and many more.

The Clown Show Must Go On!

SSH-Snake, a self-modifying worm that leverages SSH credentials.

Original Article : The Hacker News

A recently open-sourced network mapping tool called SSH-Snake has been repurposed by threat actors to conduct malicious activities.

“SSH-Snake is a self-modifying worm that leverages SSH credentials discovered on a compromised system to start spreading itself throughout the network,” Sysdig researcher Miguel Hernández said.

“The worm automatically searches through known credential locations and shell history files to determine its next move.”

SSH-Snake was first released on GitHub in early January 2024, and is described by its developer as a “powerful tool” to carry out automatic network traversal using SSH private keys discovered on systems.

In doing so, it creates a comprehensive map of a network and its dependencies, helping determine the extent to which a network can be compromised using SSH and SSH private keys starting from a particular host. It also supports resolution of domains which have multiple IPv4 addresses.

“It’s completely self-replicating and self-propagating – and completely fileless,” according to the project’s description. “In many ways, SSH-Snake is actually a worm: It replicates itself and spreads itself from one system to another as far as it can.”

BotNet CNC Control Hacker Infiltrates & Exploits Vulnerabilities Vie SSH TCP Both Hardware Software Exploited

Sysdig said the shell script not only facilitates lateral movement, but also provides additional stealth and flexibility than other typical SSH worms.

The cloud security company said it observed threat actors deploying SSH-Snake in real-world attacks to harvest credentials, the IP addresses of the targets, and the bash command history following the discovery of a command-and-control (C2) server hosting the data.

How Does It Work?

These attacks involve active exploitation of known security vulnerabilities in Apache ActiveMQ and Atlassian Confluence instances in order to gain initial access and deploy SSH-Snake.
“The usage of SSH keys is a recommended practice that SSH-Snake tries to take advantage of in order to spread,” Hernández said. “It is smarter and more reliable which will allow threat actors to reach farther into a network once they gain a foothold.”

When reached for comment, Joshua Rogers, the developer of SSH-Snake, told The Hacker News that the tool offers legitimate system owners a way to identify weaknesses in their infrastructure before attackers do, urging companies to use SSH-Snake to “discover the attack paths that exist – and fix them.”

“It seems to be commonly believed that cyber terrorism ‘just happens’ all of a sudden to systems, which solely requires a reactive approach to security,” Rogers said. “Instead, in my experience, systems should be designed and maintained with comprehensive security measures.”

Netcat file transfer chat utility. Easily Send & Receive Files Local & Remote.

“If a cyber terrorist is able to run SSH-Snake on your infrastructure and access thousands of servers, focus should be put on the people that are in charge of the infrastructure, with a goal of revitalizing the infrastructure such that the compromise of a single host can’t be replicated across thousands of others.”

Rogers also called attention to the “negligent operations” by companies that design and implement insecure infrastructure, which can be easily taken over by a simple shell script.

“If systems were designed and maintained in a sane manner and system owners/companies actually cared about security, the fallout from such a script being executed would be minimized – as well as if the actions taken by SSH-Snake were manually performed by an attacker,” Rogers added.

“Instead of reading privacy policies and performing data entry, security teams of companies worried about this type of script taking over their entire infrastructure should be performing total re-architecture of their systems by trained security specialists – not those that created the architecture in the first place.”

The disclosure comes as Aqua uncovered a new botnet campaign named Lucifer that exploits misconfigurations and existing flaws in Apache Hadoop and Apache Druid to corral them into a network for mining cryptocurrency and staging distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks.

The hybrid cryptojacking malware was first documented by Palo Alto Networks Unit 42 in June 2020, calling attention to its ability to exploit known security flaws to compromise Windows endpoints.
As many as 3,000 distinct attacks aimed at the Apache big data stack have been detected over the past month, the cloud security firm said. This also comprises those that single out susceptible Apache Flink instances to deploy miners and rootkits.

“The attacker implements the attack by exploiting existing misconfigurations and vulnerabilities in those services,” security researcher Nitzan Yaakov said.

Apache Vulnerability Update Available!

“Apache open-source solutions are widely used by many users and contributors. Attackers may view this extensive use as an opportunity to have inexhaustible resources for implementing their attacks on them.”

Hacker News:
Russian Hackers Have Infiltrated U.S. Household and Small Business Routers, FBI Warns
Original Article: MSN News

The FBI has recently thwarted a large-scale cyberattack orchestrated by Russian operatives, targeting hundreds of routers in home offices and small businesses, including those in the United States.

These compromised routers were used to form “botnets”, which were then employed in cyber operations worldwide.

The United States Department of Justice has attributed this cyberattack to the Russian GRU Military Unit 26165. Countermeasures undertaken by authorities ensured that the GRU operators were expelled from the routers and denied further access, ABC News reported.

The GRU deployed a specialized malware called “Moobot,” associated with a known criminal group, to seize control of susceptible home and small office routers, converting them into “botnets” — a network of remotely controlled systems.

The Justice Department, in an official statement, explained, “Non-GRU cybercriminals installed the Moobot malware on Ubiquiti Edge OS routers that still used publicly known default administrator passwords. GRU hackers then used the Moobot malware to install their own bespoke scripts and files that repurposed the botnet, turning it into a global cyber espionage platform.”

Utilizing this botnet, Russian hackers engaged in various illicit activities, including extensive “spearphishing” campaigns and credential harvesting campaigns against targets of intelligence interest to the Russian government, such as governmental, military, security and corporate entities in the United States and abroad.

Botnets pose a significant challenge for intelligence agencies, hindering their ability to detect foreign intrusions into their computer networks, Reuters notes.

In January 2024, the FBI executed a court-approved operation dubbed “Operation Dying Ember” to disrupt the hacking campaign. According to the Department of Justice, the FBI employed malware to copy and erase the malicious data from the routers, restoring full access to the owners while preventing further unauthorized access by GRU hackers.

FEDOR was designed as an android able to replace humans in high-risk areas, such as rescue operations,” Andrey Grigoriev, director of Russia’s Advanced Research Fund, said.